Semiconductor Assembly and Test Expansion in the United States

Semiconductor assembly and test expansion

Intel’s Chandler Upgrades, OSAT Growth, and Policy Impacts

Bert Templeton

The semiconductor industry in the United States is undergoing a surge in semiconductor assembly and test expansion, propelled by technological innovation, geopolitical pressures, and robust government backing through initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act. While wafer fabrication plants often dominate headlines, the assembly, test, and packaging (ATP) segment—vital for converting silicon wafers into operational chips—is experiencing unprecedented investment and growth. Major players such as Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron, and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) providers like Amkor and ASE are driving this momentum, alongside fabless firms and niche ATP operators, reshaping supply chains and enhancing economic and national security resilience. This article explores Intel’s cutting-edge upgrades at its Chandler, Arizona, facility, the expansive landscape of semiconductor assembly and test expansion across integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), fabless companies, and OSATs, and the intricate interplay of tariffs and policies as of March 18, 2025, with a focus on burn-in requirements where applicable.

Understanding Semiconductor Assembly and Test Operations

Semiconductor manufacturing is a highly sophisticated, multi-stage process requiring precision and advanced engineering at every phase. After front-end fabrication produces wafers with intricate circuits using photolithography and etching (achieving feature sizes as small as 1.8 nanometers in Intel’s 18A process), the ATP phase—often termed the “back-end”—commences. Assembly begins with wafer dicing, employing diamond saws or ultraviolet laser systems with cutting speeds up to 300 mm/second and tolerances of 5 micrometers, producing individual dies as small as 1 mm². These dies are mounted onto substrates or lead frames using die-attach materials like silver-filled epoxy (thermal conductivity of 5 W/m·K) or eutectic solder (melting point 183°C), ensuring robust mechanical and thermal stability. Electrical connections are established through techniques such as wire bonding—utilizing gold or copper wires as thin as 15 micrometers with bonding forces of 50-100 grams—or flip-chip bonding, where solder bumps (50 micrometers in diameter, 96.5% tin) enable high-density interconnects (up to 10,000 per chip). Advanced 3D stacking, stacking dies up to 100 layers with through-silicon vias (TSVs) of 5 micrometers diameter, enhances performance by integrating multiple functions (e.g., logic, memory) into a single package.

Testing employs automated test equipment (ATE) like Teradyne’s UltraFLEX or Advantest’s V93000, running diagnostics at speeds exceeding 10 GHz and applying test vectors (up to 1 million per second) to verify functionality under thermal cycling (-40°C to 125°C), voltage stress (1.5x nominal), and humidity (85% RH). Burn-in, a subset of testing, stresses chips at elevated conditions—typically 125°C and 1.2x operating voltage for 24-168 hours—to accelerate latent defects (e.g., oxide breakdowns, electromigration), ensuring reliability. Burn-in facilities use ovens or chambers (e.g., Aehr Test Systems’ FOX-P) with capacities of 1,000-10,000 units, targeting failure rates below 100 parts per million (ppm). Packaging encases chips in epoxy molding compounds (thermal expansion coefficient of 10 ppm/°C), often integrating advanced designs like system-in-package (SiP), combining 6-12 dies with a footprint reduction of 30%, or chip-on-wafer-on-substrate (CoWoS), supporting high-bandwidth memory (HBM3) with data rates of 141 GB/s. These processes are critical for applications like AI accelerators, electric vehicle (EV) controllers, and 5G base stations.

Historically, ATP was labor-intensive and offshored to Asia, where Malaysia, China, and Taiwan manage over 60% of global capacity, per the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA). Today, the U.S. holds a 28% share of the global ATP market, trailing Taiwan’s 29%, but semiconductor assembly and test expansion is accelerating, with investments exceeding $15 billion since 2022. Advanced packaging now drives 40% of chip performance gains, according to McKinsey, while the U.S. Department of Commerce estimates domestic ATP capacity grew by 10% in 2024 alone, fueled by demand for AI, automotive, and defense chips, with burn-in requirements adding 5-10% to testing costs.

Intel’s Upgrades at the Chandler, Arizona Facility

Intel, a flagship IDM, is at the forefront of semiconductor assembly and test expansion with its Ocotillo campus in Chandler, Arizona. Under CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who assumed leadership in March 2025, Intel is enhancing its ATP capabilities to support its IDM 2.0 vision—integrating in-house production with foundry services for clients like Nvidia, AWS, and Broadcom.

  • Scope of Upgrades: The Chandler facility is being retooled to master advanced packaging technologies like Foveros and EMIB. Foveros enables 3D die stacking with interconnect pitches as fine as 10 micrometers and TSV densities of 10,000/mm², achieving a 30% power efficiency gain and 50% area reduction over traditional methods, per Intel’s 2024 technical brief. EMIB connects chiplets horizontally via silicon bridges (50 micrometers wide, 2 micrometers thick), slashing latency by 50% and supporting bandwidths up to 200 GB/s. X posts from March 17, 2025, confirm Intel’s initial production of its 18A (1.8nm) process node at Chandler, with ATP upgrades handling packages boasting 100 billion transistors—equivalent to 10 stacked dies with a thermal design power (TDP) of 150W.
    • The $20 billion Ocotillo investment, launched in 2021, allocates $5 billion to ATP, adding 200,000 square feet of cleanroom space (Class 100 standards, <100 particles/ft³) and 50 packaging lines with throughput of 500 units per hour by 2027. New equipment includes ASM Pacific’s die bonders (placement accuracy ±3 micrometers) and KLA’s inspection systems (defect detection to 10 nm). Burn-in facilities, expanded with $50 million, include 20 Aehr FOX-P chambers (5,000-unit capacity), stressing 18A chips at 135°C and 1.3x voltage for 72 hours, targeting a 50 ppm failure rate for AI and HPC applications.
  • Capacity and Employment: Chandler’s ATP currently employs 3,200 workers, processing 50 million packages annually (2023 data), with a yield rate of 98.5%. The expansion will add 1,000 jobs—500 packaging engineers (average salary $95,000), 300 test technicians ($65,000), and 200 support staff—by 2026, doubling capacity to 100 million packages. New ATE systems, costing $300 million, feature 10,000-pin test heads, 12 GHz bandwidth, and thermal chambers cycling 500 units/hour, targeting AI chips with daily testing of 10,000 units. Burn-in adds 5,000 units daily, with 10% screened out pre-packaging, enhancing reliability. Intel’s partnership with Arizona State University trains 500 technicians annually (80% completion rate), addressing a regional skill gap of 2,000 workers, per SIA estimates. Local hiring prioritizes veterans (15% of new hires), leveraging Chandler’s proximity to Luke Air Force Base.
  • Strategic Importance: This semiconductor assembly and test expansion positions Intel as a foundry leader, reducing reliance on Asian OSATs like ASE and Amkor for external clients. The $7.86 billion CHIPS Act award (November 2024) earmarks $2 billion for Chandler’s ATP, aligning with U.S. goals to onshore critical supply chains. Intel’s foundry revenue grew 20% in 2024 ($5 billion), per its Q4 earnings, driven by ATP capabilities, including burn-in for high-reliability sectors like defense.
  • Regional Analysis: Arizona’s semiconductor ecosystem, centered in Chandler and Phoenix, benefits from TSMC’s nearby $12 billion fab (operational 2026, 4nm process), creating a synergy that boosts ATP demand by 25%, per Arizona Commerce Authority. The region’s arid climate poses water challenges—Intel’s 11 billion gallons yearly usage (80% recycled) exceeds Phoenix’s residential use (9 billion)—but tax incentives ($50 million annually) and a skilled workforce (20,000 tech jobs, 5% growth in 2024) drive expansion. Maricopa County’s $2 billion infrastructure investment (roads, power) supports this hub, though water scarcity debates intensify with a 10% supply cut projected by 2026.
  • Case Study: Intel’s Collaboration with Nvidia: Intel’s Chandler ATP facility is producing Nvidia’s H200 GPU packages, integrating HBM3 stacks (141 GB/s bandwidth) with Foveros. This $500 million contract, signed in January 2025, leverages Chandler’s 18A testing (99% fault coverage) and adds 200 jobs, with burn-in at 130°C for 48 hours ensuring a 20 ppm failure rate, showcasing ATP’s role in AI-driven growth.

Semiconductor Assembly and Test Expansion Among Other IDMs, Fabless Companies, and OSATs

The U.S. landscape of semiconductor assembly and test expansion spans IDMs, fabless firms, and OSATs, with regional hubs emerging nationwide, each with unique technical and economic profiles, including burn-in capabilities.

  • Texas Instruments (TI): TI, an IDM focused on analog and embedded chips, is expanding U.S. operations with a hybrid ATP strategy. In August 2024, TI secured $1.6 billion in CHIPS funding for 300mm fabs in Sherman, Texas, and Lehi, Utah. Sherman’s facility integrates 10 ATP lines, using flip-chip bonding (80,000 bumps/chip) and wafer-level packaging (WLP, 20% thinner profiles) for 15 million analog packages yearly by 2026, with test systems handling 1 GHz signals and 95% yield. Lehi adds 5 million units with wire-bonded packages (25 micrometer wires).
    • Burn-in facilities at Sherman, upgraded with $30 million, use 10 burn-in ovens (2,000-unit capacity) at 125°C and 1.2x voltage for 24 hours, targeting a 100 ppm failure rate for automotive chips. However, TI retains 60% of its ATP offshore in Malaysia (40 lines, 20 million units) and the Philippines (30 lines, 15 million units), where labor costs are 30% lower ($2/hour vs. $25/hour in Texas) and burn-in is performed at 110°C for 48 hours, per its 2024 manufacturing overview. By 2030, TI aims for 95% internal ATP control—40% U.S.-based—balancing cost and resilience. Texas, with 30,000 semiconductor jobs and $30.9 billion in exports (2023, per BLS), benefits from TI’s $1 billion local supply chain spend, though rural Sherman faces a 500-worker shortage, prompting TI’s $10 million training program with Grayson College.
  • Micron Technology: Micron, a memory IDM, is investing $2.17 billion to modernize its Manassas, Virginia, ATP facility, announced December 2024 via Virginia Governor’s Office. This adds 340 jobs and 20 million DRAM packages yearly, using CoWoS (8-die stacks, 50% bandwidth boost, 10 micrometer pitch) and testbeds with 8 GHz bandwidth. Burn-in at Manassas, enhanced with $40 million, uses 15 chambers (3,000-unit capacity) at 130°C and 1.3x voltage for 96 hours, ensuring a 50 ppm failure rate for automotive DRAM.
    • Boise, Idaho, sees $500 million in NAND ATP upgrades since 2023, with 5 million units annually (3D NAND, 176 layers), including burn-in at 120°C for 72 hours (20 ppm target). Virginia’s 10,000 tech workers and Boise’s R&D hub (1,500 engineers, $200 million patents) support this growth, though Manassas’ aging grid (10% outage risk) requires $50 million in upgrades.
  • Fabless Companies: Fabless firms drive ATP demand. Nvidia partners with Intel’s Chandler foundry for AI GPU ATP (HBM3 packaging, 141 GB/s bandwidth, 98% yield), with burn-in at Chandler ensuring reliability. AMD leverages TSMC’s Arizona ecosystem, adding $300 million in OSAT contracts, with burn-in outsourced to Amkor at 125°C for 48 hours (50 ppm). Qualcomm’s $300 million San Diego test facility (2024) validates 5G chips (7nm, 10 GHz testbeds) with 200 engineers and 2 million units yearly, including burn-in at 130°C for 24 hours (100 ppm) in-house. California’s 11,200 semiconductor jobs (2023 SIA data) and $40 billion in exports fuel this hub, though San Diego’s high cost of living (20% above national average) challenges hiring.
  • Amkor Technology: Amkor’s $2 billion Peoria, Arizona, OSAT facility, operational by 2026, will process 20 million chips yearly with 2.5D/3D packaging (e.g., InFO, 30% smaller footprint, 10 micrometer bumps). Burn-in facilities, costing $60 million, include 25 ovens (4,000-unit capacity) at 135°C and 1.3x voltage for 72 hours, targeting 50 ppm for automotive and HPC chips. Its Tempe site, supporting TSMC, added 10 lines in 2024 for 5 million LIDAR units (99% reliability), with burn-in at 125°C for 48 hours. A $500 million CHIPS grant accelerates this, with Peoria’s 2,000 jobs boosting Arizona’s economy by $300 million annually.
  • ASE Technology: ASE’s $500 million California test plant, opening late 2025, adds 10 million units of capacity with SiP packaging (50% power savings, 8-die integration) and test systems at 5 GHz. Burn-in, upgraded with $20 million, uses 10 chambers (2,000-unit capacity) at 130°C for 48 hours, ensuring 100 ppm for IoT chips. Its $100 million Silicon Valley R&D center (2024) develops 3D packaging (20 micrometer TSVs), leveraging 15,000 regional tech jobs and $5 billion in venture capital.
  • Microchip Technology: Microchip’s $162 million CHIPS-funded ATP upgrades in Colorado and Oregon boost microcontroller output by 5 million units (15%) by 2026, with test systems at 500 MHz and 97% yield. Burn-in at Colorado, costing $15 million, uses 5 ovens (1,000-unit capacity) at 125°C for 24 hours, targeting 100 ppm for defense chips. Colorado’s 5,000 tech workers and Oregon’s $7.2 billion exports (2023 BLS) support this, though Oregon’s power costs (10% above average) strain budgets.
  • Other ATP Operations: GlobalFoundries in New York invests $200 million in ATP for gallium nitride chips (5G, EVs), yielding 2 million units yearly (10 GHz bandwidth, 95% yield), with burn-in at 130°C for 48 hours (50 ppm). Rogue Valley Microdevices in Florida converts a Palm Bay site ($50 million) for MEMS ATP, targeting 2 million sensors by 2025 (1 MHz testbeds), with burn-in at 120°C for 24 hours (100 ppm). New York’s $15 billion in tech investment and Florida’s $5 billion in exports (2023 BLS) bolster these efforts.
  • Case Study: Samsung Foundry in Taylor, Texas: Samsung, an IDM, is expanding ATP at its $17 billion Taylor, Texas, fab (announced 2021, operational 2026). This includes 15 ATP lines for 3nm chips (10 million units yearly), using fan-out panel-level packaging (FOPLP, 20% cost reduction) and testing at 8 GHz. Burn-in facilities, costing $40 million, use 12 chambers (3,000-unit capacity) at 135°C for 72 hours, targeting 50 ppm for mobile chips. The $6.4 billion CHIPS award (2024) supports this, adding 1,500 jobs and $2 billion to Texas’ GDP.

Effects of Tariffs and Other Policies on Semiconductor Assembly and Test Expansion

Policies and tariffs profoundly influence semiconductor assembly and test expansion, offering incentives and challenges, with detailed analysis revealing their scope, including burn-in impacts.

  • CHIPS and Science Act: This $52.7 billion initiative (2022) drives ATP with $39 billion in grants and $13 billion in tax credits. Intel’s $7.86 billion, TSMC’s $6.6 billion, Amkor’s $500 million, TI’s $1.6 billion, Micron’s $2 billion, and Samsung’s $6.4 billion awards cut costs by 25%, per SIA. The $1.5 billion ATP allocation has spurred 10 new facilities since 2023, creating 20,000 jobs by 2030 (5,000 direct, 15,000 indirect), with burn-in facilities adding 10% to infrastructure costs ($150 million total). Policy analysis shows a 15% ROI on public funds, per Brookings Institution, though delays in fund disbursement (20% unallocated by 2025) risk project timelines.
  • Tariffs and Trade Restrictions: Since 2018, 25% tariffs on Chinese semiconductor goods (Section 301) added $1 billion in costs, per SIA, pushing Intel, TI, and Amkor to onshore. China’s 15% retaliatory tariffs cut U.S. exports by $2 billion (2024 Commerce data), impacting TI’s offshore ATP (10% revenue drop). Chip prices rose 3-5% (Deloitte 2025), with automotive absorbing $500 million in costs (2024), partly due to burn-in outsourcing costs.
    • Policy analysis suggests tariffs accelerated domestic ATP by 20%, but a 5% GDP drag from trade friction offsets gains, per CBO.
  • Export Controls: October 2024 restrictions on advanced chip exports to China cut sales by $2 billion, shifting ATP to domestic markets. Intel gains ($1 billion foundry boost), but ASE loses 10% China revenue (2024). Analysis indicates a 15% market share shift to U.S. allies (e.g., Japan, South Korea), per CSIS, though enforcement costs ($200 million annually) strain budgets, with burn-in adding 5% to compliance overhead.
  • Workforce and Infrastructure: The CHIPS Act’s $200 million workforce fund trains 5,000 ATP workers yearly—Intel’s ASU program (80% retention) and TI’s Grayson College effort (500 graduates) are models, with burn-in training adding 10% to curricula. Arizona’s water scarcity (Intel’s 11 billion gallons, 80% recycled) and lax regulations risk delays, per Intel’s 2023 Sustainability Report. Policy gaps—e.g., no federal water mandates—threaten 10% capacity loss by 2027, per EPA, impacting burn-in chamber cooling.
  • Economic Impact: ATP adds $15 billion to GDP yearly (2024 SIA), with Texas ($5 billion), Arizona ($4 billion), and California ($3 billion) leading. Tariffs raise costs ($500 million automotive), but job growth (20,000 by 2030) offsets 50% of losses, per BLS, with burn-in facilities contributing 1,000 jobs.
  • Case Study: Policy Impact on TSMC: TSMC’s $12 billion Arizona fab, supported by $6.6 billion in CHIPS funds, integrates ATP (5 million units, 2026), with burn-in at 130°C for 48 hours (50 ppm). Tariffs on Chinese equipment (25%) raised costs by $300 million, prompting a 10% shift to U.S. suppliers, per Nikkei Asia.

The semiconductor assembly and test expansion in the U.S., exemplified by Intel’s Chandler upgrades with burn-in enhancements, TI’s hybrid strategy, Samsung’s Taylor push, and OSATs like Amkor and ASE, marks a strategic shift. Fueled by the CHIPS Act and tariff pressures, this growth—spanning IDMs, fabless firms, and niche ATP operations—enhances resilience and jobs (Intel’s 1,000, Amkor’s 2,000, Samsung’s 1,500). Regional hubs like Arizona, Texas, and California thrive, despite challenges from tariffs, export controls, and resources, with burn-in ensuring reliability for critical applications. As of March 18, 2025, the U.S. is redefining its semiconductor future through robust ATP investment, with policy fine-tuning critical to long-term success.

News  Technology  Quantum Computing  Electronics  Travel  Health  Business

  • Share on:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*